- Morning Sickness
- Drugs in Pregnancy
- Alcohol, Nicotine, Substance Use
- Folic Acid
- Breastfeeding & Drugs
- Cancer in Pregnancy
- HIV and HIV Treatment
- Conditions in Pregnancy
- Infectious Diseases in Pregnancy
- Nutrition
- Occupational & Environmental Exposures
- Pharmacokinetics/ Drug Metabolism
- PregTox
- The ReproPsych Group
- CAS Newsletter
Our Helplines
1-877-327-4636 Alcohol and Substance
1-800-436-8477 Morning Sickness
1-888-246-5840 HIV and HIV Treatment
1-877-439-2744 Motherisk Helpline
416-813-6780 Motherisk Helpline
Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Resources
St. John's,NL
2013 FACE meeting
Orlando, Florida
Fetal Alcohol Canadian Expertise (FACE) Satellite Meeting
.
-
Jul192012
-
Mar292012
-
Jul282011
-
Jan272011
- Read more in our News Archive
Current Studies at Motherisk
-
Study seeks women between 4 and 12 weeks in their pregnancy with morning sickness (NVP)
-
Pregnancy in Women with Multiple Sclerosis
-
Environmental Exposures and Children's Health
-
Alcohol Use during Pregnancy
-
Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study
-
Folic Acid Before and During Pregnancy
-
Lamisil in Pregnancy
-
Meridia in Pregnancy
-
Autoimmune Diseases in Pregnancy Project
Ionizing radiation during pregnancy
Savithiri Ratnapalan, MBBS Nicole Bona Gideon Koren, MD, FRCPC
July 2003
QUESTION
One of my patients had a computed tomography scan of her abdomen a week ago and has just found out she is 7 weeks pregnant. What should I tell her about the pregnancy and the risk to her fetus?
ANSWER
Your patient is not at increased risk of miscarriage or major congenital fetal malformations due to radiation exposure. Her risk is similar to that of the general population (ie, 1% to 3%).
QUESTION
L'une de mes patientes a subi une tomographie assistée par ordinateur de l'abdomen il y a une semaine et vient d'apprendre qu'elle est enceinte de sept semaines. Que devrais-je lui dire à propos de sa grossesse et des risques pour le foetus?
RÉPONSE
Votre patiente ne court pas de risque d'avortement spontané ou de malformations foetales congénitales majeures en raison de l'exposition aux rayonnements. Les risques pour elle sont semblables à ceux de la population en général (c.-à-d. de 1% à 3%).
Ionizing radiation, a form of electromagnetic radiation, penetrates tissues deeply and could alter the components of a living cell. Everyone is exposed to background radiation from cosmic rays, soil, and air. Embryos usually receive less than 100 mrad during 9 months? gestation.1
Pregnancy is a major contraindication to radiodiagnostic procedures. Because 50% of pregnancies in North America are unplanned, many women are not aware they are pregnant during routine radiodiagnostic procedures.2 The term radiation seems to alarm people. They seem to associate it with the known adverse biologic effects of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II and the nuclear accident at Chernobyl in the Ukraine.1,3,4
Radiation is a dose-dependent teratogen. Below a certain threshold, radiation levels are similar in exposed populations and control populations who have received only background radiation.1 A fetus is most vulnerable to radiation-induced central nervous system damage 8 to 15 weeks after conception (Table 15).1 Radiation from x-ray and CT scans is measured in rad, rem, gray, and sievert (1 rad = 1 rem = 0.01 Gy = 0.01 Sv). Most diagnostic-imaging centres can specify the amount of radiation used for each patient; the fetal dose is calculated as that of the ovarian or uterine dose.
The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?s Radiation Safety Committee recommends that fetuses of laboratory workers not receive more than a cumulative dose of 500 mrad during the entire gestation period.6 This occupational exposure guideline is one-tenth of the safe dose and should not be confused with the teratogenic-threshold dose. Pregnant women exposed to <5000 mrad have similar pregnancy outcomes to controls who have received only background radiation.1 The United States National Council on Radiation Protection states that the risk of miscarriages, malignancies, or major congenital malformations in embryos or fetuses exposed to doses of 5000 mrad or less is negligible compared with the spontaneous risk in nonexposed fetuses.3,7 Spontaneous risk includes a 15% chance of spontaneous abortion, a 3% risk of major malformations, and a 4% possibility of intrauterine growth retardation.3,7
Most radiodiagnostic examinations expose fetuses to less than 5000 mrad of radiation (Table 2). X-ray examination of the abdomen is associated with 250 mrad, and an abdominal CT scan with 3000 mrad.5 There is no significant increase in major malformations in pregnant women inadvertently exposed to these radiation doses. These women should be reassured and counseled appropriately.3
References
1. Bentur Y. Ionizing and nonionizing radiation in pregnancy. In: Koren G, editor. Maternal-fetal toxicology. A clinician?s guide. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2001.2. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann 1998;30(1):24-9.
3. Brent RL. The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound. In: Brent RL, Beckman DA, editors. Clinics in perinatology, teratology. Vol 13. Philadelphia , Pa: Saunders; 1986. p. 615-48.
4. Bentur Y, Norlatsch N, Koren G. Exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy: perception of teratogenic risk and outcome. Teratology 1991;43:109-12.
5. Parry RA, Glaze SA, Archer BR. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics 1999;19:1289-302.
6. United States Department of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Radiation exposure during pregnancy. Atlanta, Ga: United States Department of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/manual/radman.htm#Pregnancy. Accessed 2003 May 14.
7. Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiological examinations. Br J Radiol 1999;72:773-80.
|
Table 1. Effects of radiation exposure on prenatal development |
||
|
GESTATIONAL STAGE (DAYS AFTER CONCEPTION) |
FETAL DOSE (RAD) |
OBSERVED EFFECT |
|
Preimplantation (0-14) |
5-10 |
Animal data suggest possibility of prenatal death |
|
Major organogenesis (8-56) |
20-25 |
Animal and NBS data suggest this is the most sensitive stage for intrauterine growth retardation |
|
Major organogenesis (14-105) |
|
NBS data indicate small head size; those exposed at <8 weeks did not display intellectual deficit, even with small head. Most sensitive time for induction of childhood cancer |
|
Rapid neuron development and migration (56-105) |
>10 |
Small head size, seizures, decline in intellect (-25 IQ points/100 rad) |
|
After organogenesis and rapid neuron development (105 to term) |
||
|
? Low dose |
>10 |
Increased frequency of childhood cancer |
|
? High dose |
>50 |
Severe mental retardation observed at 16-25 weeks |
|
Data from Parry et al.5 |
||
|
Table 2. Estimated fetal radiation doses during some common radiodiagnostic procedures |
|
|
EXAMINATION |
FETAL DOSE (MRAD) |
|
X-RAY |
|
|
Upper gastrointestinal series |
100 |
|
Cholecystography |
100 |
|
Lumbar spine radiography |
400 |
|
Pelvic radiography |
200 |
|
Hip and femur radiography |
300 |
|
Retrograde pyelography |
600 |
|
Abdominal (kidneys, uterus, bladder) radiography |
250 |
|
Lumbar spine, |
|
|
? Anteroposterior |
750 |
|
? Lateral |
91 |
|
? Oblique |
100 |
|
Barium enema |
1000 |
|
Intravenous pyelogram |
480 |
|
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY |
|
|
Head |
0 |
|
Chest |
16 |
|
Abdomen |
3000 |












![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](/images/rssValid.png)